ESMA shakes up securities lending for UCITS funds
26 July 2012 Paris
Image: Shutterstock
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has released guidelines on exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and other UCITS issues that affect securities lending and collateral diversification.
The guidelines were developed following a review of the current regulatory regime in Europe. ESMA found it to be 鈥渋nsufficient to address the specific features and risks associated with鈥� index-tracking UCITS and UCITS ETFs and the efficient portfolio management (EPM) techniques, such as securities lending, repo and reverse repo, that they may carry out.
In a statement, ESMA added: 鈥淸T]hese guidelines are a valuable response to many of the issues identified in the on-going debate on shadow banking and will constitute and important step in the development of the regulatory framework of UCITS.鈥�
Some commentators have said that under the guidelines all revenue that is made from securities lending must be returned to a UCITS fund and its investors.
But the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) has questioned this. ESMA鈥檚 guidelines state: 鈥淎ll the revenues arising from efficient portfolio management techniques, net of direct and indirect operational costs, should be returned to the UCITS.鈥�
In a statement, ISLA said: 鈥淭his last sentence has been the subject of some press speculation which we think is exaggerated. Whilst the wording is not as clear as we would like, we assume that it is not ESMA's intention to preclude a securities lending agent (which could be the fund manager, custodian bank or a third party firm) from charging a commercially appropriate fee for providing their services.鈥�
鈥淲e are in the process of trying to get more clarity on this part of the guidance and will be in touch with members on this point in due course.鈥�
An ESMA spokesperson confirmed that all net revenue must be returned, but this does not include the cost of running a securities lending programme.
UCITS funds that carry out securities lending have to inform investors about the activity and its associated risks, according to the guidelines.
The guidelines also allow a UCITS fund that is in a securities lending agreement to recall 鈥渁ny securities lent鈥� at 鈥渁ny time鈥� and 鈥渢erminate any agreement into which it has entered鈥�, according to the ESMA statement.
On collateral, the guidelines require UCITS funds that receive collateral to mitigate counterparty risk in OTC derivative transactions or EPM techniques to ensure that the collateral 鈥渃omplies with very strict qualitative criteria and specific limits in relation to the diversification鈥�, added the ESMA statement.
ESMA chair Steven Maijoor said: 鈥淭hese comprehensive guidelines are aimed at strengthening investor protection and harmonising regulatory practices across this important EU fund sector.鈥�
The guidelines were developed following a review of the current regulatory regime in Europe. ESMA found it to be 鈥渋nsufficient to address the specific features and risks associated with鈥� index-tracking UCITS and UCITS ETFs and the efficient portfolio management (EPM) techniques, such as securities lending, repo and reverse repo, that they may carry out.
In a statement, ESMA added: 鈥淸T]hese guidelines are a valuable response to many of the issues identified in the on-going debate on shadow banking and will constitute and important step in the development of the regulatory framework of UCITS.鈥�
Some commentators have said that under the guidelines all revenue that is made from securities lending must be returned to a UCITS fund and its investors.
But the International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) has questioned this. ESMA鈥檚 guidelines state: 鈥淎ll the revenues arising from efficient portfolio management techniques, net of direct and indirect operational costs, should be returned to the UCITS.鈥�
In a statement, ISLA said: 鈥淭his last sentence has been the subject of some press speculation which we think is exaggerated. Whilst the wording is not as clear as we would like, we assume that it is not ESMA's intention to preclude a securities lending agent (which could be the fund manager, custodian bank or a third party firm) from charging a commercially appropriate fee for providing their services.鈥�
鈥淲e are in the process of trying to get more clarity on this part of the guidance and will be in touch with members on this point in due course.鈥�
An ESMA spokesperson confirmed that all net revenue must be returned, but this does not include the cost of running a securities lending programme.
UCITS funds that carry out securities lending have to inform investors about the activity and its associated risks, according to the guidelines.
The guidelines also allow a UCITS fund that is in a securities lending agreement to recall 鈥渁ny securities lent鈥� at 鈥渁ny time鈥� and 鈥渢erminate any agreement into which it has entered鈥�, according to the ESMA statement.
On collateral, the guidelines require UCITS funds that receive collateral to mitigate counterparty risk in OTC derivative transactions or EPM techniques to ensure that the collateral 鈥渃omplies with very strict qualitative criteria and specific limits in relation to the diversification鈥�, added the ESMA statement.
ESMA chair Steven Maijoor said: 鈥淭hese comprehensive guidelines are aimed at strengthening investor protection and harmonising regulatory practices across this important EU fund sector.鈥�
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities 麻豆影视传媒 Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities 麻豆影视传媒 Times
