Trade bodies call for SFTR delay in light of COVID-19 pandemic
17 March 2020 Paris
Image: Shutterstock
Firms ability to meet the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation鈥檚 (SFTR) April go-live date 鈥渉as been critically compromised鈥� and a delay is now necessary, according to two industry bodies.
The International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) and the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) have today sent a joint letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) requesting that the process be started to push back SFTR鈥檚 first phase implementation until October.
Due to SFTR鈥檚 implementation timetable being enshrined in EU law, the decision to allow a delay lies with the European Commission, but ESMA is able to recommend that a delay is needed on the market鈥檚 behalf.
Most recently, the EU markets watchdog exercised this power in relation to the Central Securities Depositories Regulation鈥檚 settlement discipline regime, which was re-scheduled to , from September, following wide-spread market concerns and lobbying efforts from ISLA, ICMA and other industry bodies.
In their letter to the regulator, ISLA and ICMA suggest that 鈥渢he impact on personnel involved in SFTR implementation programmes, compounded by pressures on firms caused by the associated surges in market volatility and volumes, has reached a point where firms believe that their capacity to ensure compliance with the requirements as of 11 April has been critically compromised鈥�.
鈥淚n addition, firms realise that this situation will deteriorate further for some months as countries around the world implement unprecedented measures to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic,鈥� they add.
As a result, the trade bodies argue that 鈥渋n light of such exceptional circumstances鈥� ESMA should initiate, 鈥渁s a matter of urgency, the procedure for obtaining a formal delay of the SFTR reporting go-live date to an appropriate date that falls well outside the expected critical phase of the pandemic鈥�.
The associations鈥� suggested date of 11 October would align with the current deadline for the third phase of SFTR reporting, which includes buy-side members.
If a delay is not possible, the associations request that ESMA and national competent authorities 鈥減rovide forbearance and sufficient reassurance鈥� to ensure that those in-scope for the next month鈥檚 deadline will not be unduly penalised for being less than totally compliant in the first few months after go-live.
A spokesperson for ESMA tells SLT that the authority is 鈥渁ware鈥� of the market鈥檚 concerns regarding the coronavirus鈥� (COVID-19) impact on businesses and it is 鈥渃onsidering with our board the appropriate measures鈥�.
It is understood that a statement from ESMA on the matter is due in the near future.
The International Securities Lending Association (ISLA) and the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) have today sent a joint letter to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) requesting that the process be started to push back SFTR鈥檚 first phase implementation until October.
Due to SFTR鈥檚 implementation timetable being enshrined in EU law, the decision to allow a delay lies with the European Commission, but ESMA is able to recommend that a delay is needed on the market鈥檚 behalf.
Most recently, the EU markets watchdog exercised this power in relation to the Central Securities Depositories Regulation鈥檚 settlement discipline regime, which was re-scheduled to , from September, following wide-spread market concerns and lobbying efforts from ISLA, ICMA and other industry bodies.
In their letter to the regulator, ISLA and ICMA suggest that 鈥渢he impact on personnel involved in SFTR implementation programmes, compounded by pressures on firms caused by the associated surges in market volatility and volumes, has reached a point where firms believe that their capacity to ensure compliance with the requirements as of 11 April has been critically compromised鈥�.
鈥淚n addition, firms realise that this situation will deteriorate further for some months as countries around the world implement unprecedented measures to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic,鈥� they add.
As a result, the trade bodies argue that 鈥渋n light of such exceptional circumstances鈥� ESMA should initiate, 鈥渁s a matter of urgency, the procedure for obtaining a formal delay of the SFTR reporting go-live date to an appropriate date that falls well outside the expected critical phase of the pandemic鈥�.
The associations鈥� suggested date of 11 October would align with the current deadline for the third phase of SFTR reporting, which includes buy-side members.
If a delay is not possible, the associations request that ESMA and national competent authorities 鈥減rovide forbearance and sufficient reassurance鈥� to ensure that those in-scope for the next month鈥檚 deadline will not be unduly penalised for being less than totally compliant in the first few months after go-live.
A spokesperson for ESMA tells SLT that the authority is 鈥渁ware鈥� of the market鈥檚 concerns regarding the coronavirus鈥� (COVID-19) impact on businesses and it is 鈥渃onsidering with our board the appropriate measures鈥�.
It is understood that a statement from ESMA on the matter is due in the near future.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities 麻豆影视传媒 Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one securities finance news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Securities 麻豆影视传媒 Times
